Oh No, It’s the 2010 Election All Over Again: UN Sets the Stage to Shove Guineans into a Second Fraudulent Election

Manifestation_de_Bruxelles_22_Mars_2013ACKILLING
The international community has spoken. The UN Security Council issued a statement today that will drive Guineans to their second fraudulent election in three years. Having Conde as Guinea’s president is bad enough, but his fraudulent manipulations of the electoral system will give him a “majority” in the legislative election. And, while he came to the presidency without a mandate to govern because he stole the 2010 presidential election, his “win of a majority” in the legislature gives him a cosmetic validity. And, you think the repression by the state is bad now, wait until after June 30.
The UN News article follows.
Security Council welcomes agreement by Guineans to resolve differences peacefully

29 April 2013 – The Security Council today welcomed the joint declaration of non-violence signed last week in Conakry between the main Guinean stakeholders in which they committed themselves to resolve all differences exclusively through peaceful means.

In a statement issued to the press, the 15-member Council also welcomed the declaration by President Alpha Condé whereby he expressed his readiness to ensure the transparency and the credibility of the electoral process, and committed himself to accepting the results of the upcoming legislative elections.

In March, protests in the West African nation related to the polls led to several deaths and hundreds of injuries. At that time, both Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the UN human rights office appealed for calm amid the violence and urged political actors in Guinea to pursue dialogue to create conditions for peaceful elections.

The Council, which was briefed last Thursday on the situation in Guinea by Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs Jeffrey Feltman, expressed its concern over the “volatile situation” in the country.

“The members of the Security Council deplored the violent incidents that occurred during the demonstrations in Conakry on 25 April 2013, which resulted in the death of one person and injured a number of others.”

Council members also expressed their strong support for the facilitation efforts led by the Secretary-General’s Special Representative for West Africa, Said Djinnit, to resume the national political dialogue between the Government of Guinea and the opposition.

“They called upon all the parties to cooperate closely with him with a view to creating the conditions necessary for a national political dialogue conducive to the holding of free, fair, transparent and inclusive legislative elections in Guinea.”

UN Security Council Focuses on Maritime Piracy in West Africa’s Gulf of Guinea

Security Council voices concern over maritime piracy in West Africa’s Guinea

30 August 2011 – The Security Council today voiced concern over increasing maritime piracy, armed robbery and reports of hostage-taking in the Gulf of Guinea, saying the crimes were having an adverse impact on security, trade and other economic activities in the sub-region.

The Council took note of efforts by countries in the Gulf of Guinea to tackle the problem, including joint coastline patrols by Nigeria and Benin and plans to convene a summit of Gulf of Guinea heads of State to discuss a regional response.

“In this context, members of the Council underlined the need for regional coordination and leadership in developing a comprehensive strategy to address this threat,” said a statement read out to the press by Ambassador Hardeep Singh Puri of India, which holds the Council’s rotating presidency this month.

The Council urged the international community to support countries in the region, as well as the regional organizations – the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS) ¬¬– and other relevant bodies, in securing international navigation along the Gulf of Guinea, including through information exchange, improved coordination and capacity building.

The Council took note of the intention by the Secretary-General to send a UN assessment mission to look into the situation in the region and explore possible options for UN support.

Members of the Council also stressed the need for the UN Office for West Africa (UNOWA) and the UN Office for Central Africa (UNOCA) to work, within their current mandates, with the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the UN International Maritime Organization (IMO), as well as with all concerned countries and regional organizations.

UN Security Council Urges Guinea to Set Election Date – Text of Press Statement

Guinean soldiers remove boxes filled with electoral materials froma a warehouse on fire in a military camp in Conakry, 16 septembre 2010

UN Urges Guinea to Set Election Date

 18 septembre 2010

VOA News

The U.N. Security Council is urging Guinea to act swiftly in setting a new date for the presidential runoff election, which was postponed earlier in the week.

After a closed-door Council meeting Friday, the U.N. body said holding peaceful, free and fair elections is vital to re-establishing constitutional order in Guinea. 

The election had been set for Sunday.  Guinea’s electoral commission postponed the vote Wednesday after allegations of fraud, the death of the electoral  commission president and political violence.  

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has called for calm in Guinea. 

West African leaders meeting Friday in Nigeria called on Guinea to hold a runoff election within three weeks.

Supporters of former prime minister Cellou Dalein Diallo say Alpha Conde’s campaign is purposely postponing the runoff vote.  Mr. Diallo won twice as many votes as Mr. Conde in the first round.

Guinean authorities suspended campaigning last Sunday after clashes between supporters of the two candidates.

Text of  UN Security Council Press Statement on Elections in Guinea

Source: United Nations Security Council

Date: 17 Sep 2010
SC/10035
AFR/2034

The following Security Council press statement was read out today by Council President Ertuğrul Apakan (Turkey):

The members of the Security Council were briefed by Assistant Secretary-General for Political Affairs Tayé-Brook Zerihoun on the situation in Guinea.

The members of the Security Council expressed their deep concern at the clashes that occurred on 11 and 12 September in Guinea, in which one person died and at least 50 others were injured.

The members of the Security Council regretted the postponement of the second round of the presidential elections and urged the Independent National Electoral Commission to set a new date and organize it as soon as possible. The members of the Security Council stressed the importance of ensuring a peaceful, free and fair electoral process in Guinea, the only way to re-establish the constitutional and democratic order. They urged all national stakeholders to uphold the independence of the Independent National Electoral Commission and to support its efforts towards the organization of transparent and peaceful elections.

The members of the Security Council called on the Guinean authorities and the candidates in the second round of the presidential election to meet their own commitments and obligations, including the “Protocole d’Accord de Ouagadougou pour une élection apaisée” signed on 3 September 2010, under the aegis of the Facilitator, President Blaise Compaoré of Burkina Faso.

The members of the Security Council called on the Guinean authorities to take all the appropriate measures to promote a calm and peaceful electoral environment. They urged the supporters of the two presidential candidates to refrain from any provocation, incitement to hatred or recourse to violence. In this context the members of the Security Council welcomed the Interim President, General Sekouba Konaté’s declaration on the strict neutrality of the army in the electoral process.

The members of the Security Council will continue to closely follow the situation on the ground in Guinea.

* *** *

——————————————————————————–

GUINEA: UN Security Council Hails Progress Towards Resolving Political Crisis

Security Council hails progress towards resolving political crisis in Guinea

16 February 2010 – The Security Council today welcomed “recent positive developments” in Guinea, which has been gripped by unrest since Government forces opened fire on unarmed protesters last year, killing at least 150 people, and urged the transitional authorities in the West African country to prevent any further violence pending elections.

In a presidential statement read out by Ambassador Gérard Araud of France, which holds the Council’s rotating presidency for February, the 15-member body hailed moves taken by the interim president, General Sekouba Konaté, including the formation of a national unity government led by a civilian prime minister, Jean-Marie Doré, named by the opposition, and the holding of elections within six months.

“It looks forward to the timely restoration of the normal constitutional order in a peaceful manner through a civilian-led transition,” the statement said. “It calls upon the international community to bring its support to the Guinean authorities led by interim President Sekouba Konaté and Prime Minister Jean-Marie Doré, including with regard to comprehensive security and justice sector reforms, upon request from the Guinean authorities…

“It urges the national authorities to prevent any further violence, and uphold the rule of law, including promotion, protections and respect for human rights and due process and stressed their obligations towards the victims and witnesses.”

On 29 September, Guinea’s armed forces shot and killed or raped and attacked hundreds of civilian demonstrators attending a rally in the capital, Conakry, sparking international outrage and prompting Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon to set up the International Commission of Inquiry to investigate the events.

Captain Dadis Camara – who seized power in a coup in 2008 following the death of long-time president Lansana Conté – survived an assassination attempt in the interim and is currently in exile.

The Council welcomed the efforts of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the African Union (AU) and President Blaise Compaoré of nearby Burkina Faso in helping to resolve the crisis.

GUINEA: The Price of Political Rape

Guinea-Conakry: the price of political rape

Pablo Castillo Diaz and Letitia Anderson, 10 February 2010

About the authors:
Letitia Anderson is the Advocacy and Women’s Rights specialist with UN Action Against Sexual Violence in Conflict
Pablo Castillo Diaz works on advocacy and research for UNIFEM Governance Peace and Security.

The transition to democracy in Guinea-Conakry is both a lesson and a warning to those who would wield rape as an instrument of terror – whether in war or in peace.
The Republic of Guinea, a small West African country mired in extreme poverty and turmoil, is transitioning to democracy for the first time since its independence from France more than five decades ago. This month, the military junta appointed the opposition leader Jean-Marie Doré, the most vocal critic of the regime, as the country’s new prime minister, tasked mainly with leading an interim government and preparing the ground for democratic elections. No member of the military will be allowed to run.

This surprising turn of events was not brought about by external military intervention or internal revolution. It began with the September 28th crackdown by Guinean security forces in response to a pro-democracy rally that sparked universal outrage. What raised the profile of a news story that would otherwise have had a short shelf life were the dozens of reports of rape of women in broad daylight, caught on cell phone cameras. Like Bosnia’s grim detention camps or Sierra Leone’s amputations, public rape became an icon of atrocity that forced the hand of decision-makers. It pricked the collective conscience more than the beatings or the executions. In a striking reversal of history, in which rape has been silenced, sidelined and ranked lowest on a constructed hierarchy of armed horrors, this made headlines. It was different, shocking, impossible to ignore.

Brutal repression of dissidence is not new to Guinea. Comparable violence erupted just three years ago, when many died as the security forces violently repressed nationwide strikes and protests. A domestic investigation was set up but was never intended to take off. The protests of human rights organizations quickly fizzled away. This time, however, the audacity of unleashing the security forces to rape women in plain view at a public stadium and its surroundings sounded all the alarms.

The tactical use of sexual violence has become increasingly visible in recent years. Its elevation to a place on the peace and security agenda of the United Nations Security Council has cast an unprecedented spotlight on the issue. But the rape-as-weapon epidemic is not limited to war. In March of last year, an attack on the headquarters of Sierra Leone’s opposition party was allegedly accompanied by the gang-rape of most of the female staffers. There is often political method to what has long been dismissed as opportunistic madness. Like other cheap ways of terrorizing entire populations, such as suicide bombing, the military and political use of rape can also cross borders and be emulated. A well-known example is the Interahamwe, with whom armed rape crossed the border from Rwanda to DRC. In a range of conflicts and upheavals, the extensive legal and policy injunctions against sexual violence are ignored and sexual predation proliferates.

As if dramatizing this divide between policy and impact, last September saw the unanimous adoption of a resolution condemning sexual violence in the Security Council, while Guineans outside the UN complex protested widespread rape and political violence. Yet the international community responded decisively to the events of September 28th with a combination of official condemnation, travel bans, asset freezes, diplomatic efforts, and calls for accountability. This suggests the gap is narrowing between triumph in the Council Chamber and what reaches the world – and the women – beyond. The United Nations’ most significant action was the swift deployment of a Commission of Inquiry, a human rights investigation that often results in the drafting of a report that gathers dust somewhere – its findings disputed and debated but rarely acted upon. This Commission of Inquiry, however, explicitly named the head of state, Captain Moussa Dadis Camara, as well as several of his associates, as potentially liable for crimes against humanity perpetrated against Guinean civilians, and established that at least 109 women had been subjected to rape and other sexual violence of unthinkable cruelty and viciousness.

The leader of the military junta, isolated and pressured by Guinea’s neighbors in the region as much as Western countries, decided to scapegoat his security forces and blame his aide-de-camp for the violence, against all evidence and plausibility. This backfired, quite literally, prompting his flight from the country to seek medical treatment in Morocco for a bullet wound inflicted by his subordinates. With the hardliners in the army split among themselves, the balance of power shifted in favor of the opposition and the strong national desire for democracy. The mediation process, brokered by Burkina Faso’s President Compaoré, yielded an uncommonly favorable outcome, and the members of the military that seek the normalization of Guinea’s relationship with development partners appear ready to facilitate the transition.

These tentative steps towards civilian rule and democratic elections can easily be disrupted, and Guinea’s transition will have to be managed carefully. But for those who fight for sexual violence to be taken seriously as a matter of collective peace and security, the international response to Guinea suggests progress. More importantly, for those who would wield rape as an instrument of war and terror, an ostensibly cheap and easy tactic of choice, it suggests heightened stakes and potential for political backfire.

For more information on this issue go to www.stoprapenow.org

Interview: US Amb. to UN, Susan Rice, Says Action by Security Council Not Needed for Criminal Court to Investigate Guinea Massacre

 

“We are deeply, deeply disgusted and troubled by what occurred in Guinea,” Rice said. “Those civilians who risked their well being to testify and to give their stories to the commission deserve our gratitude and certainly the United States is very interested in working with the international community to implement many of the recommendations in the commissions’ report.”   

 –Susan Rice, US Ambassador to the UN

 

AP Interview: Court can probe Guinea massacre
By EDITH M. LEDERER
Associated Press
2009-12-23 10:38 AM  

The International Criminal Court can launch its own investigation into the mass killings and rapes of protesters in Guinea without any action by the U.N. Security Council, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations said Tuesday.

Susan Rice said in an interview with The Associated Press and APTN that “it’s important to point out” that Guinea ratified the Rome Statute which established the world’s first permanent tribunal to prosecute cases of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The mineral-rich but impoverished west African nation is one of 110 countries that are now bound by the statute.

Under its provisions, the court’s prosecutor has the authority to seek information and determine whether to open an investigation into events in any country that is a party to the treaty. In cases where a country has not ratified the statute, the Security Council can refer a case to the court, as it did with the conflict in the Darfur region of Sudan.

A U.N. commission investigating the events in Guinea said in a new report that the killings and rapes committed there by pro-government forces on Sept. 28 and the following days may constitute crimes against humanity.

The report said 156 people were killed or disappeared, at least 109 women were raped or subjected to other forms of sexual violence including sexual mutilation and sexual slavery, and hundreds were tortured or subjected to other cruel and inhuman treatment.

The U.N. commission said there are reasonable grounds to suspect that junta leader Capt. Moussa “Dadis” Camara, the army officer who shot him in a dispute Dec. 3, and Guinea’s anti-drug chief bear “individual criminal responsibility” for the “widespread and systematic attack” on civilians on Sept. 28 and events in the following days.

Lt. Abubakar “Toumba” Diakite, who is in hiding, told a French radio station last week that he shot the junta leader because Camara wanted him to take the blame for the September massacre of pro-democracy demonstrators.

The commission recommended that the International Criminal Court investigate “the events in Guinea with respect to those allegedly individually criminally responsible for crimes against humanity.”

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon sent the report to the Security Council and Rice said she thinks it will be discussed by the 15 council members.

“We’ll take account of our colleagues perspectives, but we are certainly interested in accountability and in return to democratic rule in Guinea and the protection of civilians,” she said.

“We are deeply, deeply disgusted and troubled by what occurred in Guinea,” Rice said. “Those civilians who risked their well being to testify and to give their stories to the commission deserve our gratitude and certainly the United States is very interested in working with the international community to implement many of the recommendations in the commissions’ report.”

The commission also recommended that the Security Council keep the issue on its agenda and that the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights establish an office in Guinea, the diplomat said.

It called for reform of Guinea’s army and judicial system, establishment of a Truth Commission in the country to look into the events of Sept. 28, reparations for victims, sanctions against the perpetrators, and information about the missing.

No More Arms Embargo: Does What Happens in Liberia, Stay in Liberia?

Liberia is getting the UNSC’s green light to begin arming itself at the time Liberia’s long traditional border with the Sierra Leone and its volatile Francophone neighbors – Guinea and Cote D’Ivoire – the two countries that are blaming Liberia for their woes.The report spoke specifically of the increasing difficulty of managing nighttime movements at border crossings in Grand Cape Mount and Grand Gedeh, an issue it said has been widely reported by the local population.

 

LIBERIA:  No More Arms Embargo

December 21, 2009

When the world was unanimous in the early 1990s that the then divided Liberia was the exporter of violence to the ECOWAS subregion, the UN slammed an arms embargo on rebels in the so-called “Greater Liberia” and the transitional government in Monrovia.

Even though critics say the embargo did very little to stop the flow of arms and spread of violence to the subregion, it remained the symbol of UN’s disapproval of arms falling into the hands of belligerent non-state actors and international arm-for-gemstone smugglers.

The global policeman says the threat has dissipated and that it is now time to let go.

The Analyst Staff has been looking at the reasons, strings attached, and implications of ending the embargo. UN Security Council (UNSC) has “adjusted” the arms embargo it imposed on Liberia some 17 years ago, making way for Liberia to help fight domestic crimes, and track and control arms movement as well as help secure its porous borders from pirates and smugglers.

The UNSC voted unanimous last Thursday in a meeting that lasted barely four minutes to authorize Liberia, for a 12-month trial period, to acquire certain military materiel for defensive purposes.

“[The UNSC decides that the measures on arms… shall not apply to the supply, sale or transfer of arms and related materiel and the provision of any assistance, advice or training, related to military activities, to the government of Liberia…” says Resolution 1903, which holds that UNMIL remains in charge of security in Liberia.

The resolution says the UNMIL factor in Liberia’s security equation remains significant because it has determined that despite the significant progress being made in Liberia, the situation there continued to constitute a threat to international peace and security in the region. The resolution also extended the 6-year-old asset-freeze regulation on former Taylor associates.

Reasons, Strings Attached

The resolution, which is based on the force of the recommendation contained in the December 11, 2009 Report of the UN Panel of Experts, said existing condition inside Liberia, plus the fact that the Sirleaf Administration has cooperated with UNMIL in its arms tracking and control program necessitated the end of the embargo.

“The Panel has not found any concrete evidence of major actual or attempted violations of the arms embargo. The national capacity of the Liberian Government to control weapons and to provide security to its citizens remains low, which is of particular concern to the Panel given the volatile regional situation in Guinea and Côte d’Ivoire,” says the Report of the Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1521 (2003) concerning Liberia. The report was signed by Chairman Abdurrahman Mohamed Shalgham.

In June 2009, according to the report, the Government of Liberia completed its internal process of ratification of the “Convention on Small Arms and Light Weapons, Their Ammunition and Other Related Materials of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)” but that it has yet to deposit its instrument of ratification with the ECOWAS secretariat.

It is not clear what Liberia’s delay in depositing the instrument of ratification would mean to its chances of acquiring arms to equip its security forces, but the unanimous resolution welcomed the “sustained progress made by the Government of Liberia since January 2006, in rebuilding Liberia for the benefit of all Liberians, with the support of the international community”.

The resolution said more instructive to the decision of UNSC was the fact that Government of Liberia had cooperated with UNMIL in weapons marking, even though it noted that insufficient progress has been made towards that end. It did not say who was responsible for the slow or lack of sufficient progress.

But it encouraged all stakeholders, including donors, to support the Government of Liberia in its efforts to meet the conditions of the resolution, which regard appropriate enforcement of the Kimberly diamond scheme for Liberia vis-à-vis border smuggling especially from neighboring Cote d’Ivoire.

It was however quick to note that there were more steep hills to climb in order to control border problems associated with arms-for-diamond trading believed to be sprouting alone the Guinea-to-Liberia-Cote d’Ivoire-to-Liberia contraband axis. As with every worthwhile opportunity comes responsibility, UNSC has demanded that the government of Liberia make all efforts necessary to enforce the asset freeze imposed against sanctioned persons and entities, which, it affirmed, was still in force.

The resolution stressed what it called the “continuing importance” of UNMIL in improving security throughout Liberia and helping the government establish its authority throughout the country, particularly in the diamond, timber, and other natural resources-producing regions, and border areas. This implies to observers that the now embargo-free Liberia would be required to play central role in deciding the level, intensity, and direction of its security programs and plan – both domestic and external.

The Council noted that acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations, it has decided that all states take the necessary measures to prevent the direct or indirect supply, sale or transfer, of weaponries from their territories to Liberia.

It mandated further that the states must also ensure that their nationals, or using their flag vessels or aircraft, do not transfer or sell arms and any related materiel, or provide assistance to any assistance, advice or training related to military activities.

The restrictions, it said, included financing and financial assistance, to all non-governmental entities and individuals operating in the territory of Liberia for a period of 12 months as of December 17, 2009. It did not say what would happen with regards to such activities beyond the stated period, but it noted that the restriction on non-state actors did not include UNMIL and troops contributing countries.

The Resolution makes allowance for troop contributing countries and UN to supply arms and related materiel as well as technical training and assistance intended solely for support of or use by the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL). The United Nations is also permitted to supply protective clothing, including flak jackets and military helmets for the use of UNMIL. Representatives of the media and humanitarian and development workers and associated personnel may also import such non-weapon materiel for the use of their personnel.

Also allowable under the arms embargo adjustment is the supply of other non-lethal military equipment intended solely for humanitarian or protective use, and related technical assistance and training, as notified in advance to the UN Committee established for the purpose.

“[The UNSC] decides, for the period time set forth …that all States shall notify in advance to the Committee any shipment of arms and related materiel to the Government of Liberia, or any provision of assistance, advice or training related to military activities for the Government of Liberia.” the resolution says.

UNMIL is exempt from the advance notice requirement, which UNSC said must state clearly, where applicable, the type and quantity of weapons and ammunitions delivered, the end-user, the proposed date of delivery and the itinerary of shipments.

It then noted that the Government of Liberia shall subsequently mark the weapons and ammunition, maintain a registry of them, and formally notify the Committee that these steps have been taken.
Relevant Links

   It said once a year, the UNSC would review the measures imposed; it has therefore directed the Committee, in coordination with the relevant designating states and with the assistance of the Panel of Experts, to update as necessary the publicly available reasons for listing for entries on the travel ban and assets freeze lists as well as the Committee’s guidelines. Once the Liberian government met the requirements for the permanent end of the arms embargo and provided justification, UNSC said would not hesitate to act accordingly.

But what was necessary in the interim, the resolution says, was for “all states” and the Sirleaf Administration to cooperate fully with the Panel of Experts in all the aspects of its mandate, which includes monitoring of the Liberian government cooperation with the 2009 Kimberley Process review team to strengthen internal controls over diamond mining and exports.

“The Panel recommends setting up a working group comprising UNMIL, the Liberian National Commission on Small Arms, the different ministries in charge of armed security forces personnel and the US Embassy in order to support the government of Liberia in complying with the requirements of the ECOWAS Convention and the recommendations of the international instrument to enable States to identify and trace, in a timely and reliable manner, illicit small arms and light weapons,” said a UN Panel report.

It said consistent support should be provided, in partnership with UNMIL, to permit the government of Liberia to acquire the capacity to mark and register properly the weapons imported into the country and to build gradually its own capacity to manage properly and safely the weapon and ammunition disposal process. Continue reading “No More Arms Embargo: Does What Happens in Liberia, Stay in Liberia?”

Leaked UN Report: Guinea Massacre was “Crime Against Humanity”

 Two articles:

Guinea massacre was ‘crime against humanity’: UN

(AFP) – 5 hours ago

PARIS — The massacre of opposition supporters carried out by Guinean troops in September amounted to a “crime against humanity”, the French foreign minister and a leaked United Nations report said Monday.

On September 28, according to a UN report cited by the daily Le Monde, troops loyal to Guinea’s ruling junta stabbed, shot or tortured to death at least 156 people and raped, mutilated or enslaved 109 women and girls.

The report said that it considered that there was enough evidence for the leader of the military regime, Moussa Dadis Camara, to be personally held to account before international justice for a crime against humanity.

Speaking separately, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said the report had been distributed to representatives of the UN Security Council members in New York on Friday and Saturday. He endorsed its conclusions.

“The episode in the stadium concerns both Guineans and the entire world, because it was a crime against humanity,” he told reporters in Paris.

“I think that it needs a specific inquiry by the International Criminal Court … Will that be enough, legally speaking? I don’t know,” he said.

Camara took power in Guinea in December last year in a military putsch carried out in the wake of president Lansana Conte’s death.

His unstable regime has not been recognised by the African Union, nor by the rest of the international community, and his plan to seek election as a civilian leader in upcoming elections has been greeted with protests.

In September, Camara’s forces attacked an opposition protest that had gathered in a stadium in the capital Conakry.

According to witnesses, human rights groups and now the 60-page UN report seen by Le Monde, the demonstration was savagely repressed by troops that shot, stabbed, mutilated and raped hundreds of prisoners.

Women and girls were carried away to barracks and officers’ homes to serve as sex slaves for several days. Others were raped at the scene with batons and knives, then some had rifles forced up their vaginas and fired.

The report’s authors interviewed 700 witnesses and warn that the number of dead and wounded is probably higher than the conservative estimate they were able to confirm.

Camara was himself shot and wounded by his aide-de-camp Aboubacar “Toumba” Sidiki Diakite on December 3, after elements of the junta fell out with each other over who should take the blame for the bloodshed. Related article: Guinea’s wounded junta chief ‘still in hospital’

He is currently in Morocco receiving treatment for his wounds, while his attacker remains on the run inside Guinea.

There are fears a civil war may erupt if he returns, but the regime has warned it would resist any attempt to deploy international peacekeepers.

Guinea/UN – massacre report
Leaked UN report says Guinea massacre ‘crimes against humanity’

Article published on the 2009-12-21 Latest update 2009-12-21 17:53 TU

Leaked United Nations report says the massacre of opposition supporters in Guinea last September amounts to “crimes against humanity”. The report was handed in to the UN Security Council on Saturday. Its authors were investigating the massacre of protesters in Conakry by governmental troops.

Although it has not yet been made public, the report clearly accuses the country’s top authorities – including junta leader Moussa Dadis Camara – of being responsible for the massacre.

According to the report, troops loyal to Guinea’s ruling junta stabbed, shot or tortured to death at least 156 people, when security forces opened fire on a crowd holding a rally in a Conakry stadium on September 28th.

The report also says that at least 190 women and young girls had been raped or subjected to sexual mutilation during the crackdown. The authors of the investigation say they consider that there is enough evidence for the leader of the military regime, Captain Moussa Dadis Camara, to be personally held accountable before international justice.

The report requests the International Court of Justice to take action against Captain Camara and several others in his entourage for crimes against humanity.

“We are now checking whether the national judiciary of Guinea is conducting their own investigation,” said Beatrice Le Frapper, from the International Criminal Court prosecutor’s office. “The ICC can only step in if the national judiciary is not conducting an investigation or prosecuting” those involved, she told RFI.

The ICC would need to receive an official referral from the UN Security Council in order to move forward, she said.
Beatrice Le Frapper, from the International Criminal Court prosecutor’s office

GUINEA: UN Says Leader Eager for Killing Probe

[Note that the African Union has expressed concern about the the UN “interferring” in the internal affairs of Guinea.  See article here.]

 

UN says Guinea’s leader eager for killing probe
By EDITH M. LEDERER
Associated Press
2009-10-22 03:58 AM  

Guinea’s military ruler has promised to cooperate with an international commission to investigate last month’s attack on unarmed pro-democracy demonstrators that left dozens dead and many injured in the West African nation, a senior U.N. official said Wednesday.

Assistant Secretary-General for Political Affairs Haile Menkerios, who led a mission to Guinea to assess prospects for an independent investigation, said Capt. Moussa “Dadis” Camara welcomed Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s decision to establish a commission to determine who was responsible for the attack.

“We met with President Dadis Camara who said himself he’s eager to have this commission come, and his government will fully cooperate with it _ and we have it in writing,” Menkerios told reporters after briefing the U.N. Security Council behind closed doors.

Camara seized power hours after longtime dictator Lansana Conte died last December. He initially said he would not run in elections scheduled for January, but recently indicated that he may have changed his mind.

On Sept. 28, presidential guard troops opened fire on tens of thousands of demonstrators attending a peaceful pro-democracy rally in the capital, Conakry. A Guinean human rights group said 157 people were killed but the government put the death toll at 57. After the deadly protest, Camara banned all gatherings and demonstrations.

Menkerios said he believes it will take about a month to choose members of the commission, finalize its terms of reference and carry out a security assessment in Guinea.

“I think the commission could finish its work within one month once it’s deployed,” he said.

Menkerios said victims, opposition members and members of the public have “tremendous” expectations for the commission’s independent investigation. He said members of civil society and human rights groups indicated they would share information they have about the attack with the commission.

France’s U.N. Ambassador Gerard Araud said he would circulate a draft presidential statement to Security Council members later Wednesday that would strongly support the establishment of the commission and African efforts to resolve the crisis in Guinea.

He said council members “expressed very wide support to the establishment of the commission” though some questions were raised, including who will pay for it.

France wants the majority of commission members to be African, including women because of allegations of sexual violence during the Sept. 28 attack, Araud said.

West African leaders said Saturday they were imposing an arms embargo on Guinea and would try to stop Camara from running in January’s presidential election.

Asked whether the Security Council would also impose an arms embargo, Araud said “for the moment” the council will let the regional group take responsibility for solving the crisis.

Menkerios stressed that security remains critical, not just for the commission but most importantly for the people of Guinea, the victims of the attack and potential witnesses.

“We have confirmation that the government welcomes and will cooperate with the commission,” he said. “Will it? That is a question that has to be seen.