FACTBOX – Key Political Risks to Watch in Guinea
Thu Jul 1, 2010 10:33am GMT
* June 27 election is potential turning-point
* Polls on schedule but risks of trouble remain
* Large-scale minerals projects awaiting green light
By Saliou Samb
CONAKRY, July 1 (Reuters) – Guinea, one of the world’s biggest sources of the aluminium ore bauxite, held the first round of a presidential election on June 27 aimed at ending a political crisis that has persisted since a 2008 military coup.
Official results have still not been announced and a run-off in July between the two front-runners is seen likely.
A truly free and fair vote could mark a turning point for the country and set a powerful example to neighbours in West Africa, where civil war, armed power grabs and accusations of rigged elections have become common.
Guineans and foreign observers see a legitimate poll as a first step towards Guinea winning back foreign aid and ensuring its mineral wealth benefits its 10 million people.
POLITICS AND THE ELECTION
The Guinean army stepped into the power vacuum left when President Lansana Conte died in December 2008 after more than two decades of rule, selecting Captain Moussa Dadis Camara as head of the junta, and de facto head of state.
Camara won early popularity but then reneged on promises to hand power back to civilians. He became an international pariah when security forces killed 150 unarmed pro-democracy marchers on Sept. 28 2009, a massacre in which the United Nations said Camara was implicated. In December an ex-aide-de-camp wounded Camara in an assassination bid, since when he has undergone medical treatment in Morocco and has been convalescing outside Guinea. His second in command Sekouba Konate took over and — to the relief of the region and with the firm backing of U.S. and French diplomacy — named a transitional government tasked to prepare elections.
What to watch:
– Disputed result. At least one candidate has already raised concerns over alleged irregularities in some districts but it is not yet clear whether this will undermine the credibility of the overal result. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has congratulated Guineans on holding Sunday’s vote and urged them to remain calm as the wait for results continues.
– Ethnic conflict. Two main contenders, Alpha Conde and Cellou Dalein Diallo, draw support essentially on ethnic lines. Conde belongs to the Malinke ethnic group, as does around 35 percent of the population, while Diallo is a Peuhl, a group which makes up around 40 percent.
Ethnic divisions have historically been a factor in Guinean politics. Malinke are seen as having held sway under President Sekou Toure, the country’s first post-independence leader, while successor Lansana Conte belonged to the minority Soussou group. Camara came from one of the minorities in the southeast of the country and a third contender, Sidya Toure, belongs to the small Diakhanke group. Many Peuhl believe it is their turn to govern. Eyewitnesses said much of the Sept. 28 violence was ethnically motivated. The nightmare scenario is that an ethnic flare-up triggers tensions among the same ethnic groups in neighbours such as Sierra Leone and Liberia.
– Army tries to retain power. Konate has not had to deal with any major rebellion within the ranks. But some analysts believe parts of the army will not readily step down from power and that whoever wins the election may have to buy off officers with some form of financial sweeteners — meaning fewer revenues to renew public services and infrastructure.
– Camara’s supporters rally. Interim premier Jean-Marie Dore has warned that supporters of Camara were plotting his return to Guinea to disrupt the election. There are concerns that Camara loyalists within the army and his native Forestiere region, may try to cause trouble around election day — a potential threat to a smooth transition to civilian rule.
– Security. Even if the army does not attempt to hold onto power or destabilise the incoming government, its past role in maintaining law and order has been counter-productive. Military discipline has improved greatly under Konate but last year soliders were blamed for robberies and attacks on civilians. Though it seems unlikely foreign firms will be targeted, some executives quit the country last year on security concerns.
Guinea relies on minerals for over 70 percent of exports. Its best established export industry is bauxite, the feedstock ore for aluminium, of which it is the world’s biggest shipper. With its Friguia complex, RUSAL has capacity for some 640,000 tonnes of alumina a year which the Russian firm ships around the world for further refining into aluminium.
As well as bauxite, Guinea is a producer of gold, but iron ore is the country’s major growth industry.
Joint ventures of Rio Tinto and Chinalco, and Vale and BSG Resources, are between them spending more than $5 billion on the Simandou and Zogota iron ore projects, deals agreed this year.
UK-listed iron ore firm Bellzone Mining Plc clinched in May a potentially crucial deal with China International Fund (CIF) under which CIF will pay $2.7 billion for Bellzone’s Kalia iron project, including a 286-km (180-mile) railway, in return for the right to buy all the Kalia output and other advantages.
What to watch:
– Contract review and security of title. Several candidates have promised to review contracts signed by the junta. But as long as the parameters of such a review are clear, most firms will be content to work with the authorities on it. Analysts point out that Guinea has an interest in maintaining relations with incumbents so as to maintain state revenues from the mines.
– Metals prices falling. Mining projects are only viable when sales prices for their product are above a certain level. Once operational, mines the size of those planned or operational in Guinea very rarely shut down altogether, but production can be cut back. Iron ore prices rose close to $200 per tonne in key market Asia this year but have since fallen to $150 per tonne.
– Strikes and protests. Output at Friguia was almost completed halted by a 16-day strike over pay earlier this year, while wildcat strikes and blockades by residents are common. Mining firms are often targeted by Guineans angry at lack of basic infrastructure and utilities provision.
– New projects. Were large-scale new projects to get the go-ahead this year, it would be a boost for the new government. Potential developments in the pipeline include a BHP Billiton -ArcelorMittal joint venture to combine iron ore assets in Guinea and Liberia, about which preliminary talks began at a company level in January.
BHP is also, with Global Alumina, Dubai Aluminium Co and Mubadala Developments, a shareholder in Guinea Alumina Corporation, a joint venture which plans to build a 3.3-million tonne-per-year alumina refinery. A report in Australia in April suggested BHP may be ready to approve the project this year.
SOCIETY AND WIDER ECONOMY
Annual mining revenues worth around $100 million to the government have not been enough to pull Guinea out of poverty, with the country ranked 170 out of 182 in the most recent United Nations Human Development Index of living standards. A smooth election is vital to any change in its fortunes.
What to watch:
– Donors coming back. The European Union last year suspended development aid and withdrew a plan for a fishing partnership with Guinea. But foreign donors will want to reward democratic progress by swiftly unblocking aid and Guinea’s new leaders can expect help, notably from Brussels and ex-colonial power France.
– Infrastructure improvements. Many Guineans are without access to electricity and running water, and less than a third of the population is literate. Any new government will be under pressure from the street to make improvements fast. (Additional reporting and writing by Daniel Magnowski; editing by Mark John and Philippa Fletcher)